Appeals court rules Chicago transfer tax hike can move ahead



Untitled design 2024 03 06T154309.877

Voters are set to decide on March 19 whether they want to quadruple the tax buyers pay on real estate purchases above $1.5 million. Realtors say it amounts to a secret tax and rent hike.

The moment has arrived — the moment to take charge. This summer, at Inman Connect Las Vegas, July 30-Aug. 1, 2024, experience the complete reinvention of the most important event in real estate. Join your peers and the industry’s best as we shape the future — together. Learn more.

The Illinois Appellate Court has ruled that a proposal asking voters to hike the tax buyers pay on real estate transactions over $1 million will be on the ballot in two weeks, reversing a lower court ruling last month that would have kept the question off the ballot.

Realtors and groups representing the city’s commercial real estate sector challenged the measure in court, saying it would amount to a hidden property tax hike that would drive up the cost of living for everyone in the city.

Currently, in Chicago, buyers of residential and commercial real estate pay a flat tax of 0.75 percent on all purchases, regardless of price. The measure would create a three-tiered rate system moving forward.

For properties that cost less than $1 million, buyers would see a slight tax cut, to 0.6 percent. For properties between $1 million and $1.5 million, the rate would increase to 2 percent, and for all properties above that, the tax would be 3 percent of the purchase price.

The measure was a key policy initiative of Mayor Brandon Johnson, who took office last year. The initiative was nearly upended last month when a circuit court judge ruled in favor of the real estate groups challenging the measure.

The judge in that case didn’t elaborate on her reasons for her ruling, which apparently left the appellate court with its own questions.

“Like the parties, we are left guessing as to the basis for the circuit court’s ruling because the lower court gave no reasons for its ruling,” Presiding Justice Raymond Mitchell wrote in his opinion reversing the circuit court ruling. “Courts do not, and cannot, interfere with the legislative process.”

The opinion sets up a final sprint for campaigns that only formally began when the City Council voted in November to put the measure on the March primary ballot. 

“As we’ve said since the trial court’s decision, this harmful measure remains on the ballot and we haven’t stopped trying to educate voters,” said Jeff Baker, CEO of Illinois Realtors. “Those who are suffering from housing instability deserve a plan.”

“We are disappointed in the outcome of this case, but felt it was important to challenge this misleading and manipulative referendum question,” said Farzin Parang, executive director of the Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago, which led the legal challenge.

“This massive tax increase would hurt homeowners, renters, union workers, and businesses throughout the neighborhoods,” Parang said. “Even worse, a yes vote on this referendum is a vote to deliver huge blank checks to the City with no plan for how millions will be accountably spent.”

Email Taylor Anderson





Source link

About The Author

Scroll to Top